Every few years a Barcelona community approves a job that costs more than a car. In most leases the tenant never sees that invoice. In some, the wording turns it into your problem. The difference is one clause and a stack of meeting minutes.
A derrama is an extraordinary call for money. The community keeps a monthly budget that covers the lift service, cleaning, insurance and the administrator; a derrama sits outside it, approved at a junta when something big has to be paid at once. A façade rehabilitation, a roof, a new lift, the structural repairs an ITE has flagged.
The numbers in Barcelona are not small. A façade rehabilitation for a mid-size building is quoted at €50,000 to €200,000, which across twelve flats is roughly €3,000 to €8,000 each. Add a roof and the lift and you are past €10,000 per door in a bad year. The money is split by each flat's participation coefficient, not by who is closest to the scaffolding.
Article 9.1.f of the Ley de Propiedad Horizontal puts the community's expenses on the owners. Works of conservation and safety are binding on all of them once the junta has approved them properly, and the debt follows the flat, not the person. That is why a seller asks for the certificate of being up to date with the community before a notary.
In a rented flat the monthly community fee can sit on your side of the ledger, because that is an ordinary expense and the lease usually says so. A derrama is not an ordinary expense. The default answer is the owner, and it stays the owner unless the contract says something much more specific than "gastos de comunidad".
To pass an extraordinary charge to a tenant you need an express clause that names it: derramas, extraordinary works, the percentage, or a clear cap. A general line about community expenses is not enough, and courts have read it narrowly for years. A clause that dumps every present and future work on the tenant regardless of cause is the kind of thing a judge can strike as abusive.
What a defensible arrangement looks like is simpler than people think: the tenant pays a fixed monthly community fee, stated as a number, and the owner keeps derramas and works decided by the junta. If the owner insists on sharing, ask for a cap and for the works to be listed — a new roof, not "any work the community may approve".
Repairs needed to keep the dwelling habitable are article 21 of the LAU, and they belong to the owner: a leaking roof, a failed boiler, the installation, the structure. Improvements are article 22, and there the tenant has rights but also duties. You have to put up with works that cannot reasonably be postponed, and the owner must give you at least three months' written notice.
Within a month of that notice you can walk away from the contract if the works affect the home, and if you stay you are entitled to a rent reduction proportional to the part you cannot use, plus compensation for expenses the works force on you. When the job drags past twenty days, that reduction stops being a courtesy and becomes the standard reading: the rent comes down in proportion to the unusable space.
Realistically: scaffolding up for two to four months, hammers from eight in the morning, windows taped or covered for days, dust in every room, water cut for a morning without much warning, and a worker on the balcony at nine asking to get in. In a stone finca regia the dust is worse because the mortar is lime and it never quite leaves.
Three things help and cost nothing. Photograph the flat the week before the scaffolding goes up, room by room, so the scratches and the cracked tile are dated. Ask the administrator, not the builder, for the site manager's name and the working hours in writing. And put the weekly cleaning during the works in a message, because "clean at the end" is what everyone says and nobody does.
Answer in writing, once, without heat. Point at article 9.1.f of the LPH for who owes the community, and at article 21 of the LAU for who owes necessary works, and ask the administrator for a copy of the junta agreement and the breakdown by coefficient. Administrators are used to this and usually answer quickly because they want the money from the person who actually owes it.
Do not withhold rent. It is the one move that turns a clean argument into a case about you, and in Catalonia it can end with the deposit and a demand for costs. Pay, object in writing, keep the receipt for the objection. If the amount is charged from your account by the administrator's direct debit, cancel the mandate in time and tell them why in the same message.
We read the community clauses, the junta minutes and the building paperwork before you commit, and we put the awkward points in writing.
Talk to us Download the rental checklist